Discussion about this post

User's avatar
no thanks's avatar

So the skinny of it is that employees 50+ are considered liabilities long term because they might retire in 10-15 years? I don't believe that, and here's why: Very few employers game plan that far out, and most would be happy to gain a competent employee for that long. The fact is that depending upon quarterly performance and earnings transforms virtually all companies into short-term quick buck chasers, which explains their unending quest for cheap part time labor, and their AI dream. As this article also touches on, this is really a cost related behavior. 50+ workers may require a more competitive payscale, but I reckon the real cost conscious concern of companies is medical insurance and retirement benefits of the older worker. No wonder why age discrimination complaints are up, it's pretty clear what's happening. Hopefully an ever increasing number of people will figure out how to work for themselves and the overly greedy corporate model will fade away

Next 30, Your Terms's avatar

What’s ending isn’t work — it’s the outdated container around it.

This captures why the shift feels unsettling and freeing, especially for women with real experience behind them.

14 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?